Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Emergent Contradiction with HulkaWoWagettingboringdon - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RAP ACTION HERO wrote: it don't matter how and why right or wrong keep posting keep ganking true the more attention you feed them the more you drive them to gank. deprive a bully (as alot of people see them) of attention and they don't find ...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.07 05:35:00
|
2. Emergent Contradiction with HulkaWoWagettingboringdon - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: The fact of the matter is that highsec miners are driven solely by their risk-averse nature. Unwilling to accept any sort of risk, unwilling to factor risk into their business plans, they engage in an activity that cannot creat...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.07 05:23:00
|
3. So why not balance things a bit more ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Luis Graca wrote: Potrondal Morrison wrote: Ammzi wrote: So you're saying an iteron shouldn't be able to kill a megathron on its own? The hell :( and you have seen a iteron killing a megathron where? here i call shenanigans
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.05 10:27:00
|
4. Tengugeddon: An Escalation of Aggression - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
you guys are all ********. i'd say hey, lets launch a tarddageddon, but then i'd be just like you guys.
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.05 02:43:00
|
5. Tengugeddon: An Escalation of Aggression - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
you know, maybe i should just get everyone i know who plays this to let their accounts slip and just troll the threads waiting for eve to give in and go f2p so i can come back and join all the tards still on here. While we're at it why don't we j...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.05 02:42:00
|
6. Is the penalty for suicide-ganking too low? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Will someone please address me the issue of the cost difference between the ganker and gankee as well as my issue with juszt creating a new alt to get around the security status drop?
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 11:35:00
|
7. Is the penalty for suicide-ganking too low? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mallak Azaria wrote: Julii Hakaari wrote: Is the gankees ship empty? Why, then, is it attacked? Often. Because the result is funny. admittance that tanking the ship would have little to no effect and that alot of suicide ganking is li...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 11:30:00
|
8. Is the penalty for suicide-ganking too low? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xython wrote: You got it in one there. CCP Likes Suicide Ganking, as it's helping flush all the illegal botter isk out of the economy. Just wait until the great minerals crash that's coming, then you're gonna see some real fun! first non tro...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 11:22:00
|
9. Is the penalty for suicide-ganking too low? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sisohiv wrote: Suicide ganking for profit makes sense in the world of New Eden but when it becomes a concerted and ongoing campaign it's no longer piracy. It's bigotry. Call a spade a a spade. EVE is seeing an attempt at culture cleansing righ...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 11:11:00
|
10. Is the penalty for suicide-ganking too low? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mallak Azaria wrote: Julii Hakaari wrote: EvilweaselSA wrote: there ought to be enough risk in putting me at risk to ensure i am 100% safe while afk mining at all times I'm sitting here asking myself what I should reply. I see this igno...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 11:10:00
|
11. Is the penalty for suicide-ganking too low? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Degren wrote: Yes, the penalty for suicide-ganking is too low. If you are suicide ganked, you should be auto-podded. I think this is a fair penalty, as the suicide-ganker has to track you down, plot and scheme and LOSE HIS SHIP for attacking ...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 11:04:00
|
12. Is the penalty for suicide-ganking too low? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Valya Niell wrote: i am curious though as to how many times you can gank people before you can't exist in high sec. (i.e. please tell me) There is no such limit. exactly.
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 10:59:00
|
13. Is the penalty for suicide-ganking too low? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Siobhan MacLeary wrote: No, the price is not too low. The price is that gankers eventually lose enough security status to not be able to go into any hisec system owned by one of the four Empires without attracting a massive fleet of NPCs tha...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 10:54:00
|
14. A Plea for Rationale in the System of Natural Consequences - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
on the bright side the outflux of miners has bottomed out the market... oh wait no because the suicide gankers have their own miners that produce stuff and eat the profit from resupplying the ganked...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 10:21:00
|
15. I Bid FareWell Also - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mallak Azaria wrote: Valya Niell wrote: okay, so here's a possibly new way to look at this. so many people find mining a boring part of this game only there to support your non mining habits... now take out the mining being nessacary as you'...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 10:08:00
|
16. I Bid FareWell Also - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mallak Azaria wrote: Valya Niell wrote: I'd like to point out that it's alot of people doing the shoving, then forcing you to do something similar to the shoving. it doesn't help that the active forum goers tend to be either whiners or kids...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 10:06:00
|
17. I Bid FareWell Also - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
okay, so here's a possibly new way to look at this. so many people find mining a boring part of this game only there to support your non mining habits... now take out the mining being nessacary as you're now just destroying the miners to get their...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 10:02:00
|
18. I Bid FareWell Also - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mina Hiragi wrote: Tanaka Sekigahara wrote: Lemme ask you, if you go into the playground, and go into the sandbox, and all the little boys and girls are trying to stuff sand up their own butts, and you decide that particular game isn't for ...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 09:55:00
|
19. I Bid FareWell Also - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
SmilingVagrant wrote: Sebastian Flux wrote: I'm new to EVE, about a week or so. Can i just ask, why don't miners just join a corp and get someone from that corp to protect them while they mine and offer some of their reward as payment? Are t...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 09:53:00
|
20. A Plea for Rationale in the System of Natural Consequences - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: I have no KM to go on so I will assume you failed to tank your ship while mining when a very well known event was going on. Welcome to EVE, a PVP game full of nasty pirates and terrorists who love people who fail to protect thems...
- by Valya Niell - at 2012.06.01 09:45:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |